Closing Time for Real Estate: An Online Collaboration For Navigating the Home Buying Process
I was recently introduced to the founders of Closing Time, a collaborative online service for real estate agents, lenders, and home buyers who are navigating the purchase process. The founders, Jonathan Aizen and Paul Knegten, come from a mix of technology and marketing/advertising backgrounds, and were more recently introduced to the real estate industry as they went through the home buying process for the first time.
Jonathan and Paul were surprised at the transition from the ultra-busy rushing of house hunting to the quiet sit-and-wait of the escrow process after a contract had been signed. They wanted to be more informed, actively involved, and in the loop online with their various service providers they had been working with to buy a home. They created Closing Time as a tool to allow that information-hungry home buyer to be immersed in the process of moving a home from “under contract” to “Sold.”
In my experience, there are two general categories of home buyers:
- Hands-off: “Curate my home purchase transaction, call me only when necessary, and bring me the keys when it’s done.”
- Hands-on: “If I don’t know what my agent is doing today, I feel like I might be missing something. Keep me in the loop daily so I don’t get anxious.”
The former is a large group, and will always be a part of the population, but the latter seems to be growing significantly. Younger, more technology-focused home buyers are very independent, and many don’t realize how much they’ll need to lean on their agent’s skills until the process is finally over. They’re often not comfortable with just “trusting” that everyone in the process is doing their job. They want to see and hear about it regularly.
This seems to be the market for Closing Time.
The product is still early in its development, so the original focus was on the San Francisco market, but it’s being developed to adapt to different cities and states based on where the transaction is located. I created an agent and 3 buyer profiles to quickly run a few transactions through the buying process. There were modifications for the Seattle market happening even as my buyers were being created.
The process can be initiated by the agent or the home buyer and, in my opinion, should usually be managed by the agent. A series of straightforward questions about the property, contract, and financing are asked of the user, and a robust set of timelines and checklists are created for the individual transaction. Buyers are kept informed daily of the items they need to be attending to, what their agent, lender, and escrow company are doing, as well as the things that those other service providers need to do at the same time.
For the information hound, I can see this as a fulfilling experience. I can relate to those folks who want to understand the minutiae of every step in a transaction. While there will certainly be some of the hands-off crowd that would be overwhelmed by the sheer number of necessary items to complete a transaction, I don’t believe that portion of the market is the focus of this product. The value, from an agent’s standpoint, would be to relieve the anxiety of their more-involved clients and streamline their communication with them–i.e. not getting phone calls 2-3 times/day.
There is also a pre-contract portion that an agent can use to get their home buyers in the loop prior to the actual signing of a contract. This has more preparation material for financing, documentation, etc. It could potentially be come an early buyer drip campaign that seamlessly transitions to a transaction management at the time of purchase.
The product is new, and the updates and customizations are happening daily at this point. It’s a business that would likely benefit greatly from a partnership with a large brokerage or real estate organization that would allow for instant credibility and a large group’s buy-in to create a base of users. I’m sure that will be making its way to the front burner soon.
Steve
Posted at 17:07h, 28 JanuaryThis is amazing, the amount of technology that Realtors use in the US, South Africa’s real estate market is still decidedly low tech.
Alex Aguilar
Posted at 06:44h, 29 JanuaryThis
thing looks pretty sweet. If this thing takes off it could
revolutionize the real estate industry. It will be interesting to see
how Closing Time and similar projects evolve and mature once they’re
tried and tested in the real world.
Mike McGee
Posted at 06:57h, 29 JanuaryDo you know if the agent can modify the steps in the plan? (Maybe someone from Closing Time could chime in.) Some of the terminology and procedures are different in our state, so I wouldn’t want to confuse the client.
Sam DeBord, SeattleHome.com
Posted at 08:07h, 29 JanuaryYes, the steps can be changed based on location. The folks at Closing Time are actually looking for a lead agent in new cities to modify it for their location. You can get first crack at using the system with your clients for free and they’ll adjust the questions to your local contract etc.
Paul Knegten
Posted at 12:32h, 29 JanuaryYes, Sam is correct (and thanks for the interest)! We are actively seeking feedback from folks like yourself to customize the plan to your state’s (and even your buyers’) unique situation. -Paul Knegten (Co-founder, Closing Time)
Mike Price
Posted at 07:13h, 29 JanuaryIn order to successfully create a true web based platform the timing will need to be right from a wide variety of participants. I had a start up in 1999 that built the a complete web based platform that allowed a real estate professional to handle everything from listing to closing in a web based back end. Setting permissions and notifications for vendors, creating reports for buyers and sellers etc. For it work effectively you really have to get aggressive about adoption of the platform by everyone. Back then we ran into too many road blocks of things like little title companies that still used 3 x 5 cards etc. There were too many bottlenecks and of course we were entirely too optimistic about our target market as well. Over a decade later and many of the same issues are there. I wish anyone embarking on this effort a lot of luck. Maybe the timing is finally right.
Sam DeBord, SeattleHome.com
Posted at 08:08h, 29 JanuaryI agree that there are a lot of roadblocks, Mike, but at least there are less than when you started your company. Aggressive adoption will definitely be necessary.
Cyndi Benavides Koehler
Posted at 08:57h, 29 JanuaryI’ve been looking for a system like this to use in my business. Years ago, I had a mortgage lender that used a similar system to notify all parties involved of the progress on their loan. My clients and I loved it!
mlbroadcast
Posted at 10:40h, 30 JanuaryOne of the biggest challenges with this type of platform from a dev standpoint are the myriad differences from one market to the next, not only regarding terminology i.e.: air conditioner in one area swamp cooler in another, but the differences in policy from one association to another. If the developers have a deep understanding of MLS data and the deal flow process, they should be able to overcome obstacles in more progressive markets. It’s like Inman said at the last connect. We can put a man on the moon, but we can’t establish a full paperless flow. (paraphrased) The same can be said for a full web based back office system. It was way ahead of its time but we took broker reciprocity at its core principle to a level that truly allowed everything to be done from creating the listing, marketing it, handling the showing details and all the minutia of completing the deal. I no longer have a dog in the hunt, so i’m not sure, but I still do not think anything exists that would accomplish the same thing. I’d sure like to see someone accomplish it, or if they have, get a peak at it, if nothing else to see consumers be able to reap the benefit of the efficacy inherent to the concept. But I digress….
Meet the Real Estate Tech Entrepreneur: Jonathan Aizen - GeekEstate Blog
Posted at 06:17h, 21 June[…] Real Estate Tech Entrepreneur interview, we’re speaking with Jonathan Aizen of Closing Time (prior Geek Estate coverage). I met Jonathan via his co-founder of Closing Time, Paul Knegten, whom I had coffee with several […]