You are here: GeekEstate Blog » Listings Syndication, Realtor.com, Zillow » The National Broker Public Portal: Simplicity, Differentiation Are the Paths To Success

The National Broker Public Portal: Simplicity, Differentiation Are the Paths To Success

Simplicity - Broker Public Portal

Image via Heinz Marketing

There has been a lot written about the possibility of a national Broker Public Portal for real estate–probably too much, for a project that’s nowhere near being off the ground yet.  Still, the idea rallies the spirits of many brokers, so it has legs.

The hurdles in front of the project are massive, and they shouldn’t be ignored.  They should become the focus of the project.  Its success will not be driven by trying to overcome them, but finding a way around them.

A member-led organization funded by part-time participants will always be severely hamstrung when competing against investor-fueled public technology companies.

Drew highlighted many of the obstacles to BPP’s success, some of which would call into question whether the project is even worth beginning.  Some of the best (synopsized):

  1. Once the 7.6-12.5 million is invested (initial website build), what is going to be invested going forward and where is the money going to come from?

  2. Is there a defensible moat that would make this an interesting business?  Up to date listings is not enough by itself.

  3. Technology providers in the real estate industry can build technology – but that doesn’t correlate to a great consumer product.

1. Let’s start with the money.  BPP would be best to accept that it will not outfund the Zillow Group.  It won’t outfund News Corp/Move, either.  It has to do something nimble, simple, and creative that doesn’t require building the massive, complex technical project that the big 3 (or 10) already have created.

2 . Up to date listings are a key differentiator, but they are clearly not enough to stand on their own.  They should be a big component of the value proposition, but building the next attractive bauble that draws consumers to the site will be necessary.

3. Real estate industry insiders are not consumer software developers, by and large.  They shouldn’t attempt to become better at building a complex nationwide product than the portals.  They could hire a team to compete but, that again would be oppressively costly if it were done at a competitive level to a Move/Zillow team.

So, don’t start building what has already been built.  Create the next zestimate.  Find that little shiny object that makes a consumer say “I want this.  I’m going to show it to my friends.  They’re going to want it, and we can’t get it anywhere else.”

What do brokers, and real estate insiders, have access to that public portals do not currently?  How can that be molded into an attention-piquing, conversation-starting, unique proprietary product that draws massive consumer-initiated traffic organically over time?

Think Drudge Report.  Think iPhones opening keyboxes.  Think On-Star in your vehicle.  Start out with a wide open mind to what your industry has its tentacles attached to, and then find niches that no one else has yet exploited.  Stick to simplicity, and draw traffic based on the unique assets you create.  Don’t try to build every restaurant in Manhattan at the same time.  Just build the delivery service that gets food to the consumers more quickly.

There must be dozens of great, simple, scalable product ideas that could be derived from a big group of industry trailblazers, based almost wholly on the technology they already own.  I’d be lying if I said I didn’t already have my own.  Having access to broad, clean data will be ultimately important.  Continuing to build the structure of the BPP organization will be necessary, but developing a product that’s unique enough to be worthy of such a grand support structure should come very early in the process.

The process of building a national broker public portal will be slow.  For it to get anywhere, the participants need to be motivated by more than fear.  They need a visible, unique, attractive product to unite behind.  They need a project that seems financially viable.

Consumers don’t adopt portals.  They use tools.  Whether those tools provide entertainment, news, education, or efficiency, the brands that provide the tools consumers value get their loyalty.  By developing that simple, nimble idea for a tool or product that differentiates BPP’s brand value first, it just might have the vision that gets brokers and consumers jumping on board in quick order.

About Sam DeBord

Sam DeBord is a former management consultant and web developer who writes for for Inman News and REALTOR® Magazine. He is Managing Broker for Seattle Homes Group with Coldwell Banker Danforth, and 2016 President-Elect of Seattle King County REALTORS®. His team sells Seattle homes, condos, and Bellevue homes.

This entry was posted in Listings Syndication, Realtor.com, Zillow and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • “Simplicity”

    The key word to success.

  • The problem with new features is that Zillow can copy pretty much anything. I do wonder if BPP could build a comparable consumer experience and then engineer a collective action to divert a significant majority of listing feeds from Zillow to BPP, leaving Zillow with no content. Hard to imagine brokers wanting to risk loss of exposure in the transition period, but perhaps possible with a massive marketing budget to educate consumers that homes for sale now live exclusively on BPP.

    • “Pretty much anything” is the point, Malcolm. What do brokers have that’s unique, and how can they leverage it in a way that Zillow can’t? That’s the key.

      I don’t think they should start by thinking “big portal”. They should think small, useful, indispensable tool that leads to later portal brand recognition.

  • We don’t need a BPP. Agents have accurate websites with great local content that neither Zillow nor a BPP offer because they are nationwide.

    Local boards should just stop allowing Zillow to post their listings. It benefits Zillow, and agents who have figured out how to make advertising on Zillow work for them, but there is no benefit for most agents.

    The inaccurate Zestimate does not benefit sellers, and neither does having inaccurate information about their listing, so not giving the listings to Zillow would benefit sellers too.

    If the local Board of Realtors take a poll of their agents, I would bet that the majority would say don’t post their listings on Zillow.

    Listings will sell just fine without them being on Zillow. There are thousands of local websites around the country that have better local information than Zillow, and their information is very accurate because of the direct MLS feed, unlike Zillow.

2008 - 2017 GEEK ESTATE · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - THEME BY Virtual Results
Hosted by Caffeine Interactive